Depth Reporting

Showing posts with label Sports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sports. Show all posts

Monday, July 14, 2008

Reporters' Guide to Covering the Olympics

image

... from Human Rights Watch (PDF):

Sports journalists who may be unaccustomed to government monitoring should know that even the most basic reporting activities may be of interest to the Chinese government. Chinese officials do not distinguish sports journalists from editorial writers or foreign correspondents and your judgment of what constitutes a story won’t be theirs. You will want to plan and act accordingly.

This guide spells out your rights as a visiting journalist in China—but also the risks you face, and the risks your Chinese contacts will face once the Beijing Games are over and you are back home. You will find here practical information on a range of subjects, from what documents to carry with you to how to identify public security officials. You will find not only general safety tips but very specific suggestions on how to evade online censorship and what to do if you are detained. You will also find a concise summary of human rights conditions in China and ideas for stories that will give your readers a glimpse of the real China behind the curtain of the Olympic extravaganza.

Remember, the victims of Adolph will be watching how you do.

[via Docuticker]

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Hellas, Hitler and the complete collection of official Olympic reports

olympics

You can download PDFs of the "official Olympic reports" back to the first Olympics of the modern era in 1896. The reports summarize each of the games, including how they were organized, what happened from day to day and who won each event. From the preface of the 1896 edition:

This revival, after the lapse of many centuries, of the international athletic Games of the ancients, irresistibly draws our thoughts towards the historic valley of Elis, within which during almost twelve centuries the flower of the Hellenic world, that is in other words, the flower of the civilized humanity of antiquity, assembled, in order, beneath the ægis of a mighty and pacific divinity, to bear witness to the continuous development and improvement, both intellectual and physical, of those who were the rulers, the inhabitants, and the defenders of the cities subject to them. Moreover the assembling and welding together of the finest specimens of ancient civilization, together with the cessation of all hostilities during the celebration of the Games, prefigured the rise of that more general doctrine of the brotherhood and peaceful union of all nations dwelling upon earth, and was a step in advance towards the grand idea of united humanity. Thus no fundamental principle of the civilization of man remained foreign to ancient Hellas.

The undertaking of a brief, but clear and accurate description of the ancient Olympic Games upon which the excavations made twenty years ago at Olympia have cast a clear light, is undoubtedly useful for a better and fuller comprehension of the International Athletic Games which are to be celebrated in Athens. We learn from it how very little modern Athletic Games differ from the ancient, not only in the general idea, but even in details, being founded on the same eternal principles which the Greeks laid down for the appreciation of the moral and physical improvement of all free citizens.

Now that's writing. The author, Timoleon Philemon, was a Greek journalist from Cyprus and the secretary general of the 1896 games.

 

hitler

The 1936 edition for the Berlin games includes this quote from Adolph Hitler:

Sporting and chivalrous competition awakens the best human qualities. It does not sever, but on the contrary, unites the opponents in mutual understanding and reciprocal respect. It also helps to strengthen the bonds of peace between the nations. May the Olympic Flame therefore never be extinguished.

You couldn't have a clearer reminder why you should never take politicians words at face value, even more so when they wrap themselves in the glory of ancient traditions. I wonder if the next edition will include mention of Tibet.

[via Global-l]

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

SportsDesigner.com: 2007 Sports Designer of the Year

SportsDesigner.com unveiled its "2007 Sports Designer of the Year" this month.

 

 

You should also check out the winners of its best infographics contest.

[via Infographics News]

Saturday, February 23, 2008

Derby DataTrack and Many Eyes: 2008 Kentucky Derby contenders, trainers and sires

This weekend we released the latest version of Derby DataTrack, our database of potential contenders for the Kentucky Derby. I know we (read: I) can do a better job presenting this data, but I haven't yet figured out how. A while ago ManyEyes added a network visualization tool and a way of embedding their visualizations on any Web site, so I thought I'd give it a try:

While this is intriguing, this isn't the solution, so if you have any thoughts on how we can do better that don't involve mastering Flash or Processing in a week, drop me a note.

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Whoa, Nellie! Empirical Tests of College Football's Conventional Wisdom

I'm not enough of a sports fan to want to spend the $5 it costs to read it, but this academic paper sounds intriguing and the kind of thing -- in theory -- statistics-oriented newspaper reporters could do, if so inclined. It's by an economist at Ohio State who specializes in economic history, economic demography, and biodemography:

College football fans, coaches, and observers have adopted a set of beliefs about how college football poll voters behave. I document three pieces of conventional wisdom in college football regarding the timing of wins and losses, the value of playing strong opponents, and the value of winning by wide margins. Using a unique data set with 25 years of AP poll results, I test college football's conventional wisdom. In particular, I test (1) whether it is better to lose early or late in the season, (2) whether teams benefit from playing stronger opponents, and (3) whether teams are rewarded for winning by large margins. Contrary to conventional wisdom, I find that (1) it is better to lose later in the season than earlier, (2) AP voters do not pay attention to the strength of a defeated opponent, and (3) the benefit of winning by a large margin is negligible. I conclude by noting how these results inform debates about a potential playoff in college football.

Monday, April 3, 2006

The evolution of the box score

Given the mean things I've said about baseball in the past, and given that it's the start of another dreary baseball season, it's only fair that I congratulate the commissioner for appointing an investigator to look into the two-decades-old steroid scandal. Besides the obvious eagerness with which the sport is moving to clean up its act, who wouldn't agree that there's no one more likely to conduct a thorough, unbiased investigation than a former U.S. Senator and current director of the Boston Red Sox? God knows, politicians are known for always telling it like it is.

I must also give baseball its props for proving that readers do appreciate numbers, as The New York Times shows in its online graphic on the evolution of the box score. The Times, however, didn't speculate on the box score's future. Here, then, are some enhancements I hope to be seeing soon:

  • Inflated earnings per game
  • The tedium ratio (cud chewing, tobacco juice spitting and crotch scratching divided by minutes played)
  • The George Will/Roger Angell factor (the sum of pseudo-intellectual romanticizing per inning)
  • Steroid-induced acne count

I just hope they can make these changes in time for Barry Bonds to break Hank Aaron's home run record. A sweetheart of a man like Bonds deserves every honor he earns.

Friday, January 20, 2006

Visualizing baseball decisions with pie charts

It's not baseball season, and even in the height of the summer I hesitate to post something about this dying, corrupt sport, but I thought this was such an interesting data visualization I had to pass it along. The Baseball Visualization Tool "is built around the basic idea that a pie chart can represent a simple yes or no decision" - in this case, whether a pitcher should be pulled from the game. You input all the factors that go into that decision and the tool, in theory at least, helps you make a better choice. It's a demonstration by a company that makes data visualization products. Personally, I found inputting the factors and understanding what the tool was trying to tell me so daunting, I think I'll just go with my gut.