Data.gov is lame (so far)
Data.gov has come out of the gate lame. This is the Obama administration's new site for sharing executive branch data in formats friendly to programmers and stat junkies. It's got the Sunlight Foundation goo-goos excited: They're offering a $10,000 prize for the best application and visualization using Data.gov's data as a way of encouraging the government to do more of this sort of thing. Craig Newmark of Craigslist, who's putting up some of the prize money, called it "a genuinely big advance in grassroots democracy." I'd like to see more government data sharing too, but to say that "we've just taken an unprecedented first step into the Era of Big Open Government," as Jake Brewer of Sunlight wrote on the Huffington Post, is to believe that the promise of something is the same as delivering it. Rounding up a tired collection of not very interesting data sets already available on other government Web sites (The Residential Energy Consumption Survey and Patent Application Bibliographic Data, together at last!) and serving them up on a not unattractive but cramped search page is barely evolutionary, much less revolutionary. Marshall Kirkpatrick of ReadWriteWeb lamented that it was "a bit of a let down" and noted that the 47 data sets there now "lean toward the least controversial matters." He searched for keywords like food, prisons and drugs -- and came up empty. It’s the tough stuff, the stuff that challenges real vested interests, that matters, of course. It reminds me of the poor marks given to Kentucky's OpenDoor Web site, which has made a show of making state spending transparent, while failing thus far in the execution. If you tell me you've spent so much for widgets, but not who's supplying the widgets and at what terms because, golly gee, doing so would piss the widget supplier off, you haven't really told me anything useful, much less praiseworthy. Yes, intentions are good, and Data.gov is promising to listen to suggestions and get better, but I'll save my huzzahs for meaningful results.

3 comments:
Yup. Amazing how putting lots of things in one place can seem like a breakthrough to everyone except the users. Because we already have that data all in one place: the internet. It's connected.
So, yeah. Open some new stuff. Build public access into every new internal-use database the feds use. Then we'll be impressed.
Thanks for the thoughtful post. Always appreciate anyone who will take the time to dig in and take a look at something important and think about how it supports (or doesn't) their work and/or the things they care about - especially when it relates to government transparency.
I'm one of the Sunlight goo-goo's and I can tell you that 47 feeds of data in one place that mostly feature things like copper smelters isn't at all acceptable to us either if it were even close to a finished product - nor is it good enough for federal CIO Vivek Kundra.
That said, the idea that our government is investing in making this data more usable and accessible and has taken these first steps is indeed a very big one considering the red tape and process it's taken to get there.
Within the month, 240,000 more feeds (not a typo) will be available on Data.gov, and while I don't expect they'll be the most controversial things either - it's another big step.
We'll continuously keep pushing for more and bigger steps until everything we need to responsibly hold our government accountable is there.
Anything short of all relevant government data that is accurate, posted online and in real-time won't be 'enough' for us either, but we are absolutely excited this month to see tangible evidence that there are indeed people actively working to bring the promise of a more transparent government to life.
Thanks again for your work ...and for the "(so far)" in your title. We don't disagree.
At first I thought, we here at Sunlight have never goo goo'd, maybe other things but never goo goo'd. Then someone told me that goo goo is a good government term. So that's fine.
You should see our Labs' Director Clay Johnson's post on Data.gov (http://sunlightlabs.com/blog/2009/05/28/what-id-change-about-datagov/). It adds a little more to the conversation.
There is definitely a long way to go for big open government to be achieved. Right now a lot of ground work is being laid and we support that whole heartedly.
Nisha Thompson
Sunlight Foundation
nthompson(at)sunlightfoundation(dot)com
Post a Comment